Brock v. Logsdon et al
Cassandra Lee Brock |
John Does 1 through 5, Dep. Amber Pellicane, Jane Does 1 through 3, Dep. Shawn Whitford, Dep. Stephanie Logsdon, Dep. Connor Sanford and Dep. William Schwan |
6:2019cv06082 |
January 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Frank P Geraci |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cassandra Lee Brock $ 400, filed by Cassandra Lee Brock. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Parrinello, John) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution(TF) |
E-Filing Notification: RE #1 COMPLAINT - the summons should be an attachment to the complaint. Action required: e-file the summonses using the event Continuation of exhibits. (TF) |
Case assigned to Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr.. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil opening. (TF) |
Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number ROC011121 (TF) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.