Roy v. Cuomo et al
Plaintiff: Lavar Roy
Defendant: Andrew M. Cuomo, Elizabeth A. Foley and Mayor Bill de Blasio
Case Number: 6:2019cv06096
Filed: February 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Charles J Siragusa
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2019 Filing 4 JUDGMENT administratively terminating the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/27/19. (JHF)
February 27, 2019 Copy of #3 Order, #4 Judgment and a new form motion to proceed in forma pauperis and Prison Authorization Form mailed to pro se plaintiff. (JHF)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER directing Clerk to administratively terminate this action. If plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall notify the Court in writing no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff's writing shall include either (1) a properly supported motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with the required certification of the Plaintiff's inmate trust account and authorization form, or (2) the $400.00 filing fees; upon plaintiffs submission of either, Clerk shall re-open this case. Clerk directed to send to plaintiff a new form motion to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting affidavit and prisoner authorization form. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 2/22/19. (JHF)
February 22, 2019 Filing 2 Letter Request from Lavar Roy, dated 2/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (BK)
February 4, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Cuomo, Elizabeth A. Foley, Bill de Blasio, filed by Lavar Roy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (JHF)
February 4, 2019 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JHF)
February 4, 2019 Prisoner Pro Se Packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Civil Case Timeline mailed to plaintiff. (JHF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roy v. Cuomo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Cuomo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elizabeth A. Foley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayor Bill de Blasio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lavar Roy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?