Diego v. Barr et al
Petitioner: Eduardo Aguirre Diego
Respondent: William Barr, Jeffrey Searls and Kristjen Nielsen
Case Number: 6:2019cv06141
Filed: February 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Charles J Siragusa
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2019 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #3 MOTION to Dismiss and Declaration byWilliam Barr, Kristjen Nielsen, Jeffrey Searls. (Khalil, Adam)
April 22, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss and Declaration by William Barr, Kristjen Nielsen, Jeffrey Searls. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Khalil, Adam)
March 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER that within 45 days of the date of this Order, Respondents shall file and serve an answer with memo of law responding to the allegations in the Petition. Petitioner shall have 25 days after his receipt of the Respondents' answer or motion to dismiss to file a written response. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of the Petition, together with a copy of this Order, electronically via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the United States Attorney's Office, Western District of New York. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 3/12/19. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(TF)
March 12, 2019 Mailed a copy of #2 order to petitioner Diego. (TF)
February 25, 2019 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Mailed prisoner pro se packet with consent form to petitioner. (TF)
February 22, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eduardo Aguirre Diego. Fee paid: Receipt # ROC011173, $5.00(TF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diego v. Barr et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eduardo Aguirre Diego
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Barr
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Adam A. Khalil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Adam A. Khalil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kristjen Nielsen
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Adam A. Khalil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?