Augustin v. Whitaker et al
Petitioner: Valdez Micheal Augustin
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls, Thomas Feeley and Matthew G. Whitaker
Case Number: 6:2019cv06154
Filed: February 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Frank P Geraci
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SCHEDULING ORDER that Respondent's answer and memorandum of law due or a motion to dismiss due within 45 days from the date of this order. Petitioner shall have 25 days upon receipt of answer (or motion to dismiss) to file a response. Clerk shall serve a copy of #1 petition and this order electronically via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Western of New York at <. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 3/7/19. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (JHF)
March 8, 2019 Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #2 Scheduling Order sent electronically via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of New York. Mailed copy of #2 Scheduling Order to pro se petitioner. (JHF)
February 28, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Valdez Micheal Augustin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (JHF)
February 28, 2019 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JHF)
February 28, 2019 Filing fee received: $5.00, receipt number BUF063399. (JHF)
February 28, 2019 Prisoner Pro Se Packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Civil Case Timeline mailed to plaintiff. (JHF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Augustin v. Whitaker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Thomas Feeley
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Valdez Micheal Augustin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?