Farash v. Central Research, Inc.
Plaintiff: Cameron Farash
Defendant: Central Research, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2019cv06359
Filed: May 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Jonathan W Feldman
Referring Judge: David G Larimer
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2019 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Central Research, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Murphy, Colleen)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 7/31/2019 at 10:00 AM before Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman. A joint proposed discovery plan is due to be filed with the Court at least 4 business days in advance of the conference. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 7/2/19. (SR)
July 1, 2019 Filing 6 TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman for all pretrial matters excluding dispositive motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 7/1/19. (PR)
July 1, 2019 ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS/DEFENDANTS: All Corporate Disclosure Statements pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.7.1(b) are to be filed within seven(7) days of this notice. (MD)
June 26, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Central Research, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Murphy, Colleen)
June 7, 2019 Filing 4 TEXT ORDER granting defendant's request for an extension of time to Answer the #1 Complaint filed by Cameron Farash. Defendant must answer or otherwise move against the complaint on or before 6/26/2019. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 6/7/19. (PR)
May 29, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cameron Farash. Central Research, Inc. served on 5/22/2019, answer due 6/12/2019. (Douglas, Alexander)
May 16, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Central Research, Inc.. (BK)
May 16, 2019 Case Assigned to Hon. David G. Larimer. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (BK)
May 16, 2019 AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation. The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution. (BK)
May 16, 2019 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (BK)
May 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Central Research, Inc. $ 400 receipt number 0209-3452544, filed by Cameron Farash. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit 1)(Douglas, Alexander)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Farash v. Central Research, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cameron Farash
Represented By: Alexander Jerome Douglas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central Research, Inc.
Represented By: Anthony M. Kroese
Represented By: Colleen M. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?