Farash v. Central Research, Inc.
Cameron Farash |
Central Research, Inc. |
6:2019cv06359 |
May 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Jonathan W Feldman |
David G Larimer |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Central Research, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Murphy, Colleen) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 7/31/2019 at 10:00 AM before Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman. A joint proposed discovery plan is due to be filed with the Court at least 4 business days in advance of the conference. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 7/2/19. (SR) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman for all pretrial matters excluding dispositive motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 7/1/19. (PR) |
ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS/DEFENDANTS: All Corporate Disclosure Statements pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.7.1(b) are to be filed within seven(7) days of this notice. (MD) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Central Research, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Murphy, Colleen) |
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER granting defendant's request for an extension of time to Answer the #1 Complaint filed by Cameron Farash. Defendant must answer or otherwise move against the complaint on or before 6/26/2019. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 6/7/19. (PR) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cameron Farash. Central Research, Inc. served on 5/22/2019, answer due 6/12/2019. (Douglas, Alexander) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Central Research, Inc.. (BK) |
Case Assigned to Hon. David G. Larimer. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (BK) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation. The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution. (BK) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (BK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Central Research, Inc. $ 400 receipt number 0209-3452544, filed by Cameron Farash. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit 1)(Douglas, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Farash v. Central Research, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cameron Farash | |
Represented By: | Alexander Jerome Douglas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Central Research, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Anthony M. Kroese |
Represented By: | Colleen M. Murphy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.