Ireland v. Rochester Institute of Technology, et al.,
LISA IRELAND |
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY and KIM SLUSSER |
6:2019cv06392 |
May 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Frank P Geraci |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss and in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion to Amend the Complaint filed by LISA IRELAND. (Attachments: #1 Attorney Affirmation (with Exhibits A-B attached thereto), #2 Certificate of Service)(Nadir, Alina) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss and in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion to Amend the Complaint filed by LISA IRELAND. (Attachments: #1 Attorney Affirmation (with Exhibits A-D attached thereto), #2 Certificate of Service)(Nadir, Alina) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. (McClung, Katherine) |
ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS/DEFENDANTS: All Corporate Disclosure Statements pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.7.1(b) are to be filed within seven(7) days of this notice. (MD) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's unopposed letter request for an extension of time to respond to Defendant Kim Slusser's #7 motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's response is due by 7/19/19, and Defendant may reply by 8/2/19. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 6/28/19. (JO) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Alina Nadir on behalf of LISA IRELAND (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Nadir, Alina) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by KIM SLUSSER. Responses due by 7/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Santiago, Fernando) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: On 6/20/19, Defendant Rochester Institute of Technology filed a #5 motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's response is due by 7/19/19, and Defendant may reply by 8/2/19. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 6/21/19. (JO) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Responses due by 7/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration of Katherine McClung Esq.)(McClung, Katherine) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint (with exhibits) and Civil Cover Sheet served on Kim Slusser on June 5, 2019, filed by LISA IRELAND. (Gregorio, Jessie) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint (with exhibits) and Civil Cover Sheet served on RIT on May 31, 2019, filed by LISA IRELAND. (Gregorio, Jessie) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, KIM SLUSSER. (TF) |
Case assigned to Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr.. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil opening. (TF) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TF) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution(TF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with Exhibits A, B and C attached thereto) against ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, KIM SLUSSER $ 400 receipt number 0209-3464674, filed by LISA IRELAND. (Attachments: #1 Summons (RIT), #2 Summons (Slusser), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gregorio, Jessie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.