Whitley v. Cuomo et al
Plaintiff: Vidal Maurice Whitley
Defendant: Governor Andrew Cuomo and DOCCS Commissioner Anthony Annucci
Case Number: 6:2019cv06442
Filed: June 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Frank P Geraci
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Vidal Maurice Whitley.(TF)
July 12, 2019 Filing 7 JUDGMENT administratively terminating this action. Signed by Clerk of Court on 7/12/19. (mailed a copy of this judgment to petitioner) (TF)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court will administratively terminate this action. Plaintiff has until August 9, 2019 to submit a signed Certification or pay $400.00 in filing fees. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 7/9/19. (mailed plaintiff a copy of this order and a blank certification form) (TF)
July 1, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Vidal Maurice Whitley. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(TF)
June 24, 2019 Filing 4 JUDGMENT administratively terminating this action. Signed by Clerk of Court on 6/24/19. (mailed a copy of this judgment to plaintiff)(TF)
June 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that the Clerk of Court will administratively terminate this action. If Plaintiff wants to reopen this case, he must submit a complete in forma pauperis motion or the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee ($400.00 total) by July 22, 2019. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 6/20/19. (mailed plaintiff a copy of this order and a form motion for IFP)(TF)
June 17, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Vidal Maurice Whitley. (BK)
June 17, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Vidal Maurice Whitley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (BK)
June 17, 2019 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. The Pro Se Packet including: the Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and the Civil Case Timeline have been mailed to the Plaintiff. (BK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitley v. Cuomo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vidal Maurice Whitley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Governor Andrew Cuomo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOCCS Commissioner Anthony Annucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?