Fowler-Posman v. NYSARC, Inc.
Linda Fowler-Posman |
NYSARC, Inc. |
6:2019cv06447 |
June 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Michael A. Telesca |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by NYSARC, Inc..(Morris, Daniel) |
E-Filing Notification: RE #8 Letter filed by NYSARC, Inc. as to NYSARC, Inc. . (Morris, Daniel). This document contains a request for relief and should be filed as a motion. ACTION REQUIRED: Re-file document using the motion event. (BK) |
Filing 8 Letter filed by NYSARC, Inc. as to NYSARC, Inc. . (Morris, Daniel) |
ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS/DEFENDANTS: All Corporate Disclosure Statements pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.7.1(b) are to be filed within seven(7) days of this notice. (MD) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Linda Fowler-Posman. NYSARC Inc served on 7/25/2019, answer due 8/15/2019. (Hartt, James) Modified on 8/12/2019 (LB). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel William Morris on behalf of NYSARC, Inc. (Morris, Daniel) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to NYSARC, Inc.. (BK) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT Linda Fowler-Posman against NYSARC, Inc., filed by Linda Fowler-Posman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - EEOC Right to Sue, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Amended Civil Cover, #3 Proposed Amended Summons)(Hartt, James) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Linda Fowler-Posman. NYSARC, Inc. served on 7/5/2019, answer due 7/26/2019. (Hartt, James) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to NYSARC, Inc.. (BK) |
Case Assigned to Hon. Michael A. Telesca. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (BK) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation. The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution. (BK) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (BK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Linda Fowler-Posman against NYSARC, Inc. $ 400 receipt number 0209-3493719, filed by Linda Fowler-Posman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - US EEOC Right to Sue, #3 Proposed Summons)(Hartt, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fowler-Posman v. NYSARC, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Linda Fowler-Posman | |
Represented By: | James D. Hartt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: NYSARC, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Daniel William Morris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.