Smith v. Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP
Plaintiff: Ryan Smith
Defendant: Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP
Case Number: 6:2019cv06508
Filed: July 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: David G Larimer
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2019 Filing 7 STIPULATION re #4 Summons Returned Executed, 6 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer by Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP. (Fjermedal, Glenn)
July 24, 2019 Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer to 8/28/19. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 7/24/19. (PR)
July 24, 2019 ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS/DEFENDANTS: All Corporate Disclosure Statements pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.7.1(b) are to be filed within seven(7) days of this notice. (CGJ)
July 24, 2019 E-Filing Notification: #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Summons Returned Executed . Notice of Motion. A notice of motion is required for all motions, and must state: the relief sought, the grounds for the request, the papers submitted in support, and the return date for the motion, if known. A moving party who intends to file and serve reply papers must so state in the notice of motion. (BK)
July 23, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Summons Returned Executed by Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP.(Fjermedal, Glenn)
July 22, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ryan Smith. Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP served on 7/12/2019, answer due 8/2/2019. (Barshay, David)
July 9, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP. (BK)
July 8, 2019 Case Assigned to Hon. David G. Larimer. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (BK)
July 8, 2019 AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation. The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution (BK)
July 8, 2019 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (BK)
July 8, 2019 Summons not provided, therefore not issued. (BK)
July 5, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David Michael Barshay on behalf of Ryan Smith (Barshay, David)
July 5, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP $ 400 receipt number 0209-3509704, filed by Ryan Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanders, Craig)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP
Represented By: Glenn M. Fjermedal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan Smith
Represented By: David Michael Barshay
Represented By: Craig B. Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?