Smith v. Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP
Ryan Smith |
Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP |
6:2019cv06508 |
July 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
David G Larimer |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 STIPULATION re #4 Summons Returned Executed, 6 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer by Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP. (Fjermedal, Glenn) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer to 8/28/19. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 7/24/19. (PR) |
ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS/DEFENDANTS: All Corporate Disclosure Statements pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.7.1(b) are to be filed within seven(7) days of this notice. (CGJ) |
E-Filing Notification: #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Summons Returned Executed . Notice of Motion. A notice of motion is required for all motions, and must state: the relief sought, the grounds for the request, the papers submitted in support, and the return date for the motion, if known. A moving party who intends to file and serve reply papers must so state in the notice of motion. (BK) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Summons Returned Executed by Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP.(Fjermedal, Glenn) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ryan Smith. Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP served on 7/12/2019, answer due 8/2/2019. (Barshay, David) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP. (BK) |
Case Assigned to Hon. David G. Larimer. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (BK) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation. The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution (BK) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (BK) |
Summons not provided, therefore not issued. (BK) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David Michael Barshay on behalf of Ryan Smith (Barshay, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP $ 400 receipt number 0209-3509704, filed by Ryan Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smith v. Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Relin, Goldstein & Crane, LLP | |
Represented By: | Glenn M. Fjermedal |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ryan Smith | |
Represented By: | David Michael Barshay |
Represented By: | Craig B. Sanders |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.