Hodge v. Barr et al
Petitioner: Andrew Hodge
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls and William P. Barr
Case Number: 6:2019cv06630
Filed: August 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Frank P Geraci
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2019 Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time. Respondents now have until November 8, 2019 to file their response to the petition. Petitioner may file a reply within 25 days after he receives Respondents' response. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 10/17/2019. A copy of this order has been mailed to the pro se Petitioner. (MFM)
October 10, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Order,, by William P. Barr, Jeffrey Searls.(Moar, Daniel)
September 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SCHEDULING ORDER, by October 18, 2019, Respondents must file and serve an answer responding to the allegations in the Petition. Respondents must also file and serve a memorandum of law addressing each of the issues raised in the Petition. Petitioner will have 25 days after he receives Respondents answer or motion to dismiss to file a written response. The Clerk of Court will serve a copy of the Petition and this Order via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the United States Attorneys Office, Western District of New York. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 9/3/19. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (mailed a copy of this order to the petitioner)(TF)
August 28, 2019 Filing 2 Letter from Andrew Hodge, dated 8/12/19, to Clerk of Court (TF)
August 28, 2019 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Prisoner Pro se packet, including Consent form, privacy notice and civil case timeline mailed to the petitioner. (TF)
August 26, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Andrew Hodge.(TF)
August 26, 2019 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number BUF065605 (TF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hodge v. Barr et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Daniel Barrie Moar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William P. Barr
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Daniel Barrie Moar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andrew Hodge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?