Ortiz v. Royce
| Antonio Ortiz, Jr. |
| Mark Royce |
| 6:2019cv06663 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Frank P Geraci |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Respondent must file and serve an Answer responding to the allegations in the Petition by January 16, 2020. Petitioner will have 30 days after he receives Respondents answer or other pleading to file a written reply. The Clerk of Court will electronically serve a copy of the Petition and this Order via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the Office of the Attorney General, Federal Habeas Unit. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 10/18/19. (Attachments: #1 petition) (mailed a copy of this order to petitioner)(TF)
|
| Filing 6 Letter from Antonio Ortiz, Jr., dated 9/21/19, to Clerk. (mailed plaintiff a copy of the docket) (TF) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antonio Ortiz, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TF) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT administratively terminating this case. Signed by Clerk on 9/17/19. (JHF) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER administratively terminating this case without prejudice. Petitioner may reopen this case by submitting the $5.00 filing fee or a complete motion by 10/16/19. If Petitioner submits the fee or a proper motion, the Clerk will re-open this case. Clerk will send Petitioner an in forma pauperis motion form. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 9/16/19. (JHF)
|
| Copy of #3 Order, #4 Judgment and motion for in forma pauperis form mailed to pro se petitioner. (JHF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antonio Ortiz, Jr.(TF) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Antonio Ortiz, Jr. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(TF) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Prisoner Pro Se packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, and Civil Case Timeline mailed to plaintiff. (TF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ortiz v. Royce | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Mark Royce | |
| Represented By: | Alyson Gill, Arlene Roces, Laura Stockmyer (e-service) |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Antonio Ortiz, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
