Whitfield et al v. Monroe County et al
| Estate of Roxanne Whitfield-Odle and Ebony Whitfield |
| Jane Doe, JOHN DOE, Monroe County Sheriff Department and Monroe County |
| 6:2019cv06670 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Jonathan W Feldman |
| Charles J Siragusa |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 11/20/2019 02:00 PM before Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman's successor. The parties shall file a proposed discovery plan no fewer than four business days before the conference. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 10/2/19. (BJJ)
|
| Filing 4 TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman. The Magistrate Judge is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. All non-dispositive motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 9/19/19. (KJA) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Monroe County, Monroe County Sheriff Department.(Sanders, Paul) |
| Filing 2 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS by Monroe County, Monroe County Sheriff Department. to #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet filed by Monroe County, Monroe County Sheriff Department. (Sanders, Paul) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution(TF) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TF) |
| E-Filing Notification: #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL, a civil cover sheet should be an attachment to the Removal. Action required: e-file the civil cover sheet using the Continuation of Exhibits event.(TF) |
| Case assigned to Hon. Charles J. Siragusa. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil opening. (TF) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Monroe County Sheriff Department, Monroe County from Monroe County Supreme Court, case number E2019007901. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0209-3585750), filed by Monroe County Sheriff Department, Monroe County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Sanders, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
