Musheyev v. Barr et al
Petitioner: Dmitriy Musheyev
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls, William Barr and Thomas Feeley
Case Number: 6:2019cv06729
Filed: September 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Frank P Geraci
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2019 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #4 MOTION to Dismiss byWilliam Barr, Thomas Feeley, Jeffrey Searls. (Coriell, David)
November 15, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by William Barr, Thomas Feeley, Jeffrey Searls. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit A)(Coriell, David)
October 18, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Coriell on behalf of William Barr, Thomas Feeley, Jeffrey Searls (Coriell, David)
October 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SCHEDULING ORDER Respondent shall file and serve an answer or alternative and memorandum of law by November 18, 2019. Petitioner shall have 25 days upon receipt to file a written response. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of the petition and this order via Notice of Electronic Filing to the United States Attorney's Office, Western District of New York. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 10/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (Clerk mailed to petitioner a copy of this order.) (LB)
September 30, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Dmitriy Musheyev. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (BK)
September 30, 2019 The Pro Se Packet including: the Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and the Civil Case Timeline have been mailed to the Plaintiff. (BK)
September 30, 2019 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number ROC011753. (BK)
September 30, 2019 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (BK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Musheyev v. Barr et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls
Represented By: David M. Coriell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Barr
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: David M. Coriell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Thomas Feeley
Represented By: David M. Coriell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dmitriy Musheyev
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?