Peguero Ramirez v. Barr et al
| Ramon Peguero Ramirez |
| Jeffrey Searls, Thomas Feeley, Chad Wolf and William P. Barr |
| 6:2020cv06018 |
| January 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Charles J Siragusa |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| A copy of #5 Order and #1 Petition have been sent via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the United States Attorney's Office, Western District of New York at USANYW-Immigration-Habeas@usdoj.gov. (BK) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying #3 Motion to Expedite. Petitioner's application for an expedited hearing [#3] is denied; and it is furtherORDERED, that within 45 days of the date of this Order, Respondents shall file and serve an answer responding to the allegations in the Petition; and it is furtherORDERED that within 45 days of the date of this Order, Respondents shall file and serve, in addition to their answer, a memorandum of law addressing each of the issues raised in the Petition and including citations to supporting authority and applicable sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act; and it is furtherORDERED that within 45 days of the date of this Order, instead of their answer, Respondents may file a motion to dismiss the Petition, accompanied by appropriate exhibits demonstrating that an answer to the Petition is unnecessary; and it is furtherORDERED that Petitioner shall have 25 days after his receipt of the Respondents answer or motion to dismiss to file a written response; and it is furtherORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of the Petition, together with a copy of this Order, electronically via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the United States Attorney's Office, Western District of New York at USANYW-Immigration-Habeas@usdoj.gov. THE PETITIONER MUST FORWARD A COPY OF ALL FUTURE PAPERS AND CORRESPONDENCE TO THE ATTORNEY APPEARING FOR THE RESPONDENTS.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 2/12/20. (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
| E-Filing Notification: Document contains so ordered line and should be submitted via e-mail to the assigned judge. Refer to the Administrative Guide for e-mail addresses. No action required #3 MOTION to Expedite petition for writ of habeas corpus. (BK) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #3 MOTION to Expedite petition for writ of habeas corpus byRamon Peguero Ramirez. (Moravec, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Expedite petition for writ of habeas corpus by Ramon Peguero Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Moravec, Joseph) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (CGJ) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION signed by Joseph Moravec re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ramon Peguero Ramirez . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DOCCS Information Printout, #2 Exhibit ICE Detention Decisions)(Moravec, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0209-3702019.), filed by Ramon Peguero Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Moravec, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
