Brown v. The State of New York et al
| Kenneth Brown |
| Superintendent T. Stitch, The Company of Kaplen & Schmidt "Electrical", State Inspectors John Doe (1), (2), The Company of Betlem Heating and Aircooling, Jane Doe (1), (2), Programs Dept. M. Hill, John Doe (1), (2), Admin. Dept. S. Durfee, Supervisor Mr. Cabrera, The State of New York, Law Library Officer John Doe (1), (2) and Security Dept. C. Yehl |
| 6:2020cv06042 |
| January 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Frank P Geraci |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Prisoner Pro Se packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, and Civil Case Timeline mailed to plaintiff. (TF) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Kenneth Brown.(TF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenneth Brown.(TF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kenneth Brown.(TF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
