Carstairs v. University of Rochester
| Daniel Carstairs |
| University of Rochester |
| 6:2020cv06690 |
| September 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Charles J Siragusa |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STIPULATION AND ORDER, Answer due date updated as to University of Rochester answer due 12/4/2020. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 10/20/20. (KAP)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by University of Rochester. (McGuirk, Richard) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice admission filed by Yvette Golan. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 10/08/2020. (MJK)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
| Verified admission to the New York State Bar for Attorney Yvette Golan. (MD) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to appear pro hac vice ( Filing fee $ 200 receipt number 0209-4001319.) by Daniel Carstairs. (Attachments: #1 Oath of Office, #2 Admission by Petition, #3 ECF Registration Form, #4 Attorney's Oath Yvette Golan, #5 Sponsoring Affidavit)(Andrews, Seth) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint Extending Time to Answer Complaint by University of Rochester. (McGuirk, Richard) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard A. McGuirk on behalf of University of Rochester (McGuirk, Richard) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daniel Carstairs. University of Rochester served on 9/14/2020, answer due 10/5/2020. (Andrews, Seth) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to University of Rochester. (JD) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. Charles J. Siragusa. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (JD) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(JD) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against University of Rochester $ 400 receipt number 0209-3970061, filed by Daniel Carstairs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Andrews, Seth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carstairs v. University of Rochester | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Carstairs | |
| Represented By: | Seth Andrews |
| Represented By: | Yvette Golan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: University of Rochester | |
| Represented By: | Richard A. McGuirk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
