Worley v. State of New York et al
| Antal Troy, Lennon and State of New York |
| Michael Worley |
| 6:2020cv06709 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Charles J Siragusa |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Worley. (BK) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Lennon, State of New York, Antal Troy against Michael Worley. Signed by Mary C. Loewenguth, Clerk of Court on 9/21/2020. (JLV) Copy mailed to pro se petitioner, along with Doc. No. #3 Order, and Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and supporting affirmation. |
|
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Worley. (BK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Michael Worley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (BK) |
| The Pro Se Packet including: the Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and the Civil Case Timeline have been mailed to the Plaintiff. (BK) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (BK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.