Strauss v. Kentucky Board Medical Licensure (KBML)
| John Matthew Strauss, M.D. |
| Kentucky Board Medical Licensure (KBML) |
| 6:2020cv06835 |
| October 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| David G Larimer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Matthew Strauss, MD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JHF) |
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT administratively terminating the case. Signed by Clerk on 11/2/20. (JHF) |
| Clerk mailed copy of #2 Decision and Order, #3 Judgment and blank motion for in forma pauperis form to pro se plaintiff. (JHF) |
| Filing 2 DECISION AND ORDER The Clerk of Court shall administratively terminate this action; and it is furtherORDERED, that the Clerk of Court is directed to send to plaintiff a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting affirmation; and it is furtherORDERED, that if plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify this Court, in writing, no later than thirty days from the date of this Order. This writing must include either (1) a properly supported motion to proceed in forma pauperis, or (2) the $400.00 filing fee; and it is furtherORDERED, that upon Plaintiff's submission of either (1) a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, or (2) the $400.00 filing fee, the Clerk of Court shall reopen this case. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 10/30/2020. Copy of this Decision and Order sent by First Class Mail to plaintiff Jon Matthew Strauss, M.D., on 10/30/2020 to his address of record. (KAH)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kentucky Board Medical Licensure (KBML), filed by John Matthew Strauss, MD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(JHF) |
| Pro Se Packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, Pro Se Assistance Program, Civil Case Timeline and ADR Notification mailed to plaintiff. (JHF) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JHF) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation. The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution. (JHF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Strauss v. Kentucky Board Medical Licensure (KBML) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kentucky Board Medical Licensure (KBML) | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Matthew Strauss, M.D. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
