Sarwar v. Henry et al
Plaintiff: Deborah Laufer and Saim Sarwar
Defendant: Stuart Henry and Carol Henry
Case Number: 6:2020cv06984
Filed: November 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A Wolford
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2021 E-Filing Notification: Missing case caption and/or case number. Action required: re-file document in proper format with the correct case number. File the corrected document using the "Summons Returned Executed" docketing event. (AMW)
January 5, 2021 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for summons and complaint served on Stuart Henry on 12/18/2020, filed by Saim Sarwar. (Staehr, Jonathan)
January 5, 2021 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for summons and complaint served on Carol Henry on 12/18/2020, filed by Saim Sarwar. (Staehr, Jonathan)
November 20, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Carol Henry, Stuart Henry. (JD)
November 20, 2020 Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Saim Sarwar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 proposed summons, #3 proposed summons)(Staehr, Jonathan)
November 20, 2020 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JD)
November 20, 2020 Case Assigned to Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (JD)
November 20, 2020 AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(JD)
November 17, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants $ 400 receipt number 0209-4050388, filed by Deborah Laufer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 proposed summons, #3 proposed summons)(Staehr, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sarwar v. Henry et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stuart Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carol Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Laufer
Represented By: Jonathan E. Staehr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saim Sarwar
Represented By: Jonathan E. Staehr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?