Adams v. Taylor
Plaintiff: Robert Adams, III
Defendant: Corrections Officer Taylor
Case Number: 6:2021cv06056
Filed: January 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A Wolford
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Pro Se Unit LETTER RESPONSE to re #9 Letter. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (JHF)
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Letter from Robert Adams, III, dated 3/8/21, to Judge Wolford. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JHF)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 DECLARATION filed by Robert Adams, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JHF)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Adams, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JHF)
February 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Service by US Marshal by Robert Adams, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JHF)
February 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Letter from Robert Adams, III, dated 2/1/21, to Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JHF)
February 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Adams, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JHF)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 JUDGMENT administratively terminating the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/2/21. (JHF)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER administratively terminating the action. If Plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall pay the filing fees of $402.00, or notify the Court in writing as directed no latter than 30 days from the date of this order. Clerk directed to send to Plaintiff a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting affirmation and authorization form. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 2/1/21. (JHF)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Remark: copy of #2 order, #3 judgment, and a new form motion to proceed in forma pauperis and Prison Authorization Form mailed to plaintiff. (JHF)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Taylor, filed by Robert Adams, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Letter, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope) (JHF)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JHF)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Prisoner Pro Se Packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Civil Case Timeline mailed to plaintiff. (JHF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Adams, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corrections Officer Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?