Cenesca v. Feeley et al
Yvensi Jeff Cenesca |
Merrick B. Garland, Thomas Feeley, Alejandro Mayorkas and Jefferey Searls |
6:2021cv06390 |
May 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
David G Larimer |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by John D. Fabian on behalf of All Defendants (Fabian, John) |
Mailed a copy of #2 Order to petitioner. (TF) |
Filing 2 ORDER that within 45 days of the date of this Order, Respondents shall file and serve an answer responding to the allegations in the Petition. Petitioner shall have 25 days after his receipt of the Respondents' answer or motion to dismiss to file a written response. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of the Petition, together with a copy of this Order, electronically via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the United States Attorney's Office, Western District of New York. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 6/3/2021. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(TF) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Yvensi Jeff Cenesca. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LMD) |
Prisoner Pro Se Packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Civil Case Timeline mailed to petitioner. (LMD) |
Pro Hac Vice fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number BUF78115 (LMD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.