Calderon v. Stack et al
| Angel T. Calderon |
| Kathy Stack, Jason Haug, Michele Badalato and City of Niagara Falls Police Department |
| 6:2021cv06603 |
| September 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Charles J Siragusa |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Michele Badalato, Jason Haug, Kathy Stack, filed by Angel T. Calderon. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(TF) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re Mailed plaintiff a copy of his original complaint, a blank 1983 complaint form and the instructions for preparing an amended complaint per 5 Order sent to Angel T. Calderon (TF) |
| Mailed plaintiff a copy of his original complaint, a blank 1983 complaint form and the instructions for preparing an amended complaint per #5 Order. (TF) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint without 45 days of entry of this Order. Please refer to order for further orders of the Court. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 11/1/21. Copy of this NEF and order to pro se plaintiff at Niagara County Jail. (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Angel T. Calderon. (JHF) |
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT administratively terminating the case. Signed by Clerk on 10/8/21. (JHF) |
| Clerk mailed copy of #2 order, #3 judgment and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis to pro se plaintiff at: Angel T. Calderon, 142250, NIAGARA COUNTY JAIL, BOX 496, LOCKPORT, NY 14094. (JHF) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall administratively terminate this action without filing the Complaint or assessing a filing fee; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to send to Plaintiff a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting affirmation; and it is further ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify this Court in writing no later than 30 days from the date of this Order. This writing must include either (1) a properly supported motion to proceed in forma pauperis with a supporting affirmation or (2) the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee ($402.00 total); and it is further ORDERED that upon Plaintiff's submission of either (1) a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or (2) the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee ($402.00 total), the Clerk of Court shall reopen this case without further order. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 10/7/21. Copy of this NEF and order mailed to pro se plaintiff at PO Box 496, Lockport, NY 14094 (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michele Badalato, City of Niagara Falls Police Department, Jason Haug, Kathy Stack, filed by Angel T. Calderon. (Attachments: #1 envelope, #2 Envelope)(TF) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Prisoner Pro Se packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, and Civil Case Timeline mailed to plaintiff.(TF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
