Crenshaw v. Rine et al
| William Crenshaw |
| Investigator Mark Rine, Investigator Erin Rogers, Sergeant Supervisor Deryl Goston and Sheriffs Deputy Joseph Corono |
| 6:2021cv06639 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| David G Larimer |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter from Plaintiff, dated 11/7/21, to Courtroom Deputy. (RE) |
| Filing 6 Letter from Plaintiff, dated 11/28/21, to Courtroom Deputy. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RE) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Plaintiff, dated 11/16/21, (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Pro Se Forms for Rule 56 Motion mailed to plaintiff).(RE) |
| Filing 4 Letter from William Crenshaw, dated 10/27/2021, to Hon. David G. Larimer (LMD) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief by William Crenshaw. (LMD) |
| Filing 2 Letter from Plaintiff, dated 10/18/21. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by William Crenshaw. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LMD) |
| Filing fee paid: $ 402.00, receipt number ROC013141 (LMD) |
| Prisoner Pro Se Packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Civil Case Timeline mailed to plaintiff. (LMD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
