Lopez Alvarado v. Garland et al
| Jacinto Lopez Alvarado |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Thomas Brophy and Jeffrey Searls |
| 6:2021cv06749 |
| December 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION to appear pro hac vice ( Filing fee $ 200 receipt number ANYWDC-4450389.) by Jacinto Lopez Alvarado. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Supporting Documents, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Peng, John) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANYWDC-4450167.), filed by Jacinto Lopez Alvarado. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit In re Jacinto Lopez Alvarado, Not. to Appear, #3 Exhibit In re Jacinto Lopez Alvardo, Order (Aug. 3, 2021), #4 Exhibit In re Jacinto Lopez Alvarado, Order (Sept. 8, 2021), #5 Exhibit In re Jacinto Lopez Alvarado, Mot. Contesting Charge of Inadmissibility, #6 Exhibit In re Jacinto Lopez Alvarado, Not. of Custody Determination (Apr. 27, 2021), #7 Exhibit In re Jacinto Lopez Alvarado, Mot. for In-Person Production)(Peng, John) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Unassigned. Case transferred to Buffalo 21-cv-1293. All future docketing shall be entered on the Buffalo case. (TMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
