Vazquez Santillan v. Garland et al
| Arturo Vazquez Santillan |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Thomas Brophy and Jeffrey Searls |
| 6:2022cv06017 |
| January 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Frank P Geraci |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Answer and Return RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,,,, by Thomas Brophy, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Jeffrey Searls. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum of Law, #2 Declaration Ball Declaration, #3 Declaration Marshall Declaration, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit, #17 Exhibit, #18 Exhibit)(Messuri, Anthony) |
| E-Filing Notification: Clerk modified the following entry to clarify the entry #4 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony J. Messuri on behalf of All Respondents (Messuri, Anthony) Modified on 3/3/2022 (LMD). No action required. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony J. Messuri on behalf of All Respondents (Messuri, Anthony) Modified on 3/3/2022 (LMD). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Telo Gillman on behalf of Arturo Vazquez Santillan (Gillman, Sarah) |
Filing 2
ORDER directing Respondent's answer and memorandum of law due or a motion to dismiss due within 45 days of this order. Petitioner shall have 25 days upon receipt of answer (or motion to dismiss) to file a response. Clerk shall serve a copy of 1 petition and this order electronically via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Western of New York at |
| Copy of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Order sent electronically via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of New York. (LMD) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANYWDC-4472268.), filed by Arturo Vazquez Santillan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit DOCCS, Inmate Lookup, #3 Exhibit In re Vazquez Santillan, Not. to Appear, #4 Exhibit In re Vazquez Santillan, Add'l Charges of Inadmissibility/Deportability, #5 Exhibit People v. Vazquez-Santillan, Cert. of Disposition, #6 Exhibit In re Vazquez Santillan, IJ Order (Feb. 5, 2021), #7 Exhibit In re Vazquez Santillan, Resp't's Mot. for Joseph Hr'g, #8 Exhibit In re Vazquez Santillan, IJ Oral Dec. (Mar. 10, 2021), #9 Exhibit In re Vazquez Santillan, Resp't's Mot. to Terminate, #10 Exhibit In re Vazquez Santillan, IJ's Dec. and Order (Mar. 23, 2021), #11 Exhibit In re Vazquez Santillan, IJ's Oral Dec. (Apr. 22, 2021), #12 Exhibit In re Vazquez Santillan, BIA Order (Oct. 4, 2021), #13 Exhibit In re Vazquez Santillan, BIA Order (Oct. 8, 2021, #14 Exhibit Vazquez Santillan v. Garland, ACMS Docket Report, #15 Exhibit USCIS, Filing Receipt)(Peng, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
