Luce v. GasBuddy, Inc.
| Ronald Luce |
| GasBuddy, Inc. |
| 6:2022cv06115 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| David G Larimer |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ronald Luce (Reese, Michael) |
| Filing 15 Letter filed by GasBuddy, Inc. as to GasBuddy, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Farraher, John) |
| Filing 14 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS by GasBuddy, Inc., to E-Filing Notification re Dkt. 10, Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of David G. Thomas filed by GasBuddy, Inc. (Neidl, Cynthia) |
| Filing 13 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS by GasBuddy, Inc., to E-Filing Notification re Dkt. 9, Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of John F. Farraher filed by GasBuddy, Inc. (Neidl, Cynthia) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to David G. Thomas. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 9/21/22. (JHF)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to John F. Farraher, Jr. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 9/21/22. (JHF)
|
| E-Filing Notification: #9 MOTION to appear pro hac vice of John F. Farraher, Jr. #10 MOTION to appear pro hac vice of David G. Thomas. Until attorney is admitted, signatures are required rather than /s/. Please resubmit documents. (DDS) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to appear pro hac vice of David G. Thomas (Filing fee $200 receipt number ANYWDC-4670631) by GasBuddy, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David G. Thomas, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E) (Neidl, Cynthia) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to appear pro hac vice of John F. Farraher, Jr. (Filing fee $200 receipt number ANYWDC-4670601) by GasBuddy, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of John F. Farraher, Jr., #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E) (Neidl, Cynthia) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Ronald Luce. (Reese, Michael) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by GasBuddy, Inc. Per the Stipulation, Responses due by 7/22/2022; Replies due by 8/19/2022. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 6/22/22. (PR)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND PROPOSED ORDER by Ronald Luce. (Reese, Michael) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by GasBuddy, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Class Action Complaint, #3 Declaration of Yannick Lord, #4 Exhibit A - Sign-Up Design and Disclosures, #5 Exhibit B - Terms and Conditions, #6 Declaration of David Thomas, #7 Exhibit A - Account Disclosures and Agreement, #8 Exhibit B - Rules Governing Deposit Accounts) (Neidl, Cynthia) |
| Answer due date updated as to GasBuddy, Inc. answer due 6/17/2022. (JHF) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION Extending Defendant's Time to Respond to Complaint by GasBuddy, Inc. (Neidl, Cynthia) |
| Answer due date updated as to GasBuddy, Inc. answer due 6/13/2022. (JHF) |
| ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS/DEFENDANTS: All Corporate Disclosure Statements pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.7.1(b) are to be filed within seven (7) days of this notice. (KM) |
| Filing 3 STIPULATION Extending Defendant's Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by GasBuddy, Inc.. (Neidl, Cynthia) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Ronald Luce. GasBuddy, Inc. waiver sent on 3/22/2022, answer due 5/23/2022. (Reese, Michael) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. David G. Larimer. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK) |
| Original Summons Not Submitted (TMK) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GasBuddy, Inc. $ 402 receipt number ANYWDC-4522700, filed by Ronald Luce. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reese, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Luce v. GasBuddy, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronald Luce | |
| Represented By: | Michael Robert Reese |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GasBuddy, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Cynthia E. Neidl |
| Represented By: | David G. Thomas |
| Represented By: | John F. Farraher, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
