Vertiv Corporation v. Opticool Technologies, LLC
Vertiv Corporation |
Opticool Technologies, LLC |
6:2022cv06126 |
March 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Marian W Payson |
Elizabeth A Wolford |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hon. Marian W. Payson for all pretrial matters excluding dispositive motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 5/13/22. (RE) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Opticool Technologies, LLC. (Stanat, Erika) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Vertiv Corporation by Opticool Technologies, LLC.(Stanat, Erika) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Attorney: Tony R. Sears no longer appearing for Plaintiff Vertiv Corporation. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP. (Sears, Tony) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Vertiv Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Vertiv Group Corporation, Other Affiliate Vertiv Intermediate Holding II Corporation, Other Affiliate Vertiv Holding Corporation, Other Affiliate Vertiv Holdings, LLC, Other Affiliate Vertiv Holdings Co., Other Affiliate VPE Holdings, LLC, Other Affiliate Vertiv Intermediate Holding Corporation for Vertiv Corporation.. (Sears, Tony) |
ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS/DEFENDANTS: All Corporate Disclosure Statements pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.7.1(b) are to be filed within seven (7) days of this notice. (KM) |
Filing 3 Report on the Filing or Determination of Patent or Trademark Case sent to USPTO. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(LMD) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Opticool Technologies, LLC. (LMD) |
Case assigned to Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford. Notification to chambers of on-line case opening. (LMD) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (LMD) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution. (LMD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Opticool Technologies, LLC $ 402 receipt number ANYWDC-4529278, filed by Vertiv Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 PTO Report)(Sears, Tony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vertiv Corporation v. Opticool Technologies, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Vertiv Corporation | |
Represented By: | Tony R. Sears |
Represented By: | Eric J. Ward |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Opticool Technologies, LLC | |
Represented By: | Erika N.D. Stanat |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.