Williams v. Million
| Rosemarie Williams |
| Tom Million d/b/a CEO Specialized Loan Servicing LLC and Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC |
| 6:2022cv06554 |
| December 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Frank P Geraci |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Notice of Appearance, Corporate Disclosure Statement, Motion to Dismiss served on Plaintiff - Rosemarie Williams on February 1, 2023, filed by Tom Million, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (Singh, Mitra)
|
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER: On January 31, 2023, Defendants requested an extension of time to respond to the complaint, ECF No. 5, and filed a motion to dismiss, ECF No. 8. Given that Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, their request for extension of time is DENIED AS MOOT. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4). Plaintiff may respond to Defendants' motion by March 1, 2023. Defendants may file a reply by March 15, 2023.The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of this order. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 2/1/2023. (MFM)Clerk to Follow up
|
|
Set Deadlines/Hearings in re #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: Plaintiff Response due by 3/1/2023. Defendant Reply due by 3/15/2023. (JHF)
|
|
Clerk mailed copy of 9 Text Order to pro se plaintiff. (JHF)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Tom Million, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A - Complaint)(Singh, Mitra)
|
|
Filing 7
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Computershare Limited, Corporate Parent Specialized Loan Servicing Holdings, LLC for Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (Singh, Mitra)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Mitra Paul Singh on behalf of Tom Million, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (Singh, Mitra)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Tom Million.(Singh, Mitra)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rosemarie Williams. Tom Million served on 1/10/2023, answer due 1/31/2023. (JHF)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE by Rosemarie Williams. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JHF)
|
|
Filing 2
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Rosemarie Williams. (JHF)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Tom Million, filed by Rosemarie Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (JHF)
|
|
Filing fee: $402.00, Paper Receipt number 6-0036. (JHF)
|
|
Summons Issued as to Tom Million. Clerk mailed to Plaintiff. (JHF)
|
|
Pro Se Packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, Pro Se Assistance Program, Civil Case Timeline and ADR Notification given to plaintiff. (JHF)
|
|
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation. The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution. (JHF)
|
|
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JHF)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
