Quest Diagnostics Incorporated v. Heathwood Assisted Living at Penfield, Inc.
| Quest Diagnostics Incorporated |
| Heathwood Assisted Living at Penfield, Inc. |
| 6:2022cv06563 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| David G Larimer |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| E-Filing Notification: Please note for future reference that the proper event is summons returned executed. No action required re #3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint. (TF) |
| RE #3 - SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. Heathwood Assisted Living at Penfield, Inc. served on 1/17/2023, answer due 2/7/2023. (TF) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Heathwood Assisted Living at Penfield on January 17, 2023, filed by Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. (Glennon, Peter) |
| ATTENTION ALL PARTIES OR INTERVENORS: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and/ or General Order No. 157. In the Matter of Disclosure of Members, Shareholders, Partners, and Leaders of Business Organization Parties, all Corporate Disclosure Statements are to be filed with the first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. (KM) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Heathwood Assisted Living at Penfield, Inc. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Heathwood Assisted Living at Penfield, Inc. $ 402 receipt number ANYWDC-4750602, filed by Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit NY DOH Contract, #2 Exhibit LTC Contract, #3 Exhibit Invoices, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons)(Glennon, Peter) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. David G. Larimer. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated v. Heathwood Assisted Living at Penfield, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Peter John Glennon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Heathwood Assisted Living at Penfield, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
