Robb v. Celk Distilling LLC et al
| Alexander Robb |
| Celk Distilling LLC and David W. DeFisher |
| 6:2023cv06142 |
| March 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Frank P Geraci |
| Marian W Payson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Celk Distilling LLC, David W. DeFisher. (Hoffmann, Stephanie) |
Filing 6
ORDER (Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 5/24/2023 at 11:40 AM before Hon. Marian W. Payson. Counsel will be provided dial-in instructions by email prior to the conference.) Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 4/26/2023. (KAH)
|
| ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS OR INTERVENORS: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.7.1 and/or General Order No. 157. In the Matter of Disclosure of Members, Shareholders, Partners, and Leaders of Business Organization Parties, all Corporate Disclosure Statements are to be filed within seven (7) days of this notice. (KM) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Hon. Marian W. Payson, United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial matters excluding dispositive motions. The parties are encouraged to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Consent forms are available from the chambers of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. The parties may give consent to a Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and enter a final order dispositive of each motion; or such consent may be given for a limited purpose such as the disposition of a particular motion that would otherwise be before the District Judge in the absence of such consent. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 4/21/2023. (MFM) |
| ADR Plan electronically forwarded to attorneys. The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TF) |
| Filing 4 Answer with Affirmative Defenses ANSWER to Complaint by Celk Distilling LLC, David W. DeFisher.(Glennon, Peter) |
| E-Filing Notification: Please note for future reference that the proper event is summons returned executed. No action required RE #3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on David DeFisher on 03/03/2023, filed by Alexander Robb. (TF) |
| re #3 - SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alexander Robb. Celk Distilling LLC served on 3/3/2023, answer due 3/24/2023. (TF) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on David DeFisher on 03/03/2023, filed by Alexander Robb. (Cordello, Justin) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Celk Distilling LLC. (TMK) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants $ 402 receipt number ANYWDC-4811134, filed by Alexander Robb. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Cordello, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
