Smith v. The City Of Rochester et al
| Lekia Smith |
| The City Of Rochester, P.O. Charles LoTempio, Charles LoTempio and John Does Nos. 1-10 |
| 6:2023cv06162 |
| March 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Mark W Pedersen |
| Charles J Siragusa |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 6/28/2023 at 10:00 AM before Hon. Mark W. Pedersen. A joint proposed discovery plan is due to be filed at least 4 business days prior to the conference. The proceeding will take place by telephone. Using a landline telephone, Counsel is directed to call 877-402-9753, and enter access code 7137484 at the scheduled date and time. Signed by Hon. Mark W. Pedersen on 5/15/2023. (JB)
|
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hon. Mark W. Pedersen. The Magistrate Judge is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. All non-dispositive motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 5/12/2023. (KJA) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Charles LoTempio, The City Of Rochester.(Campolieto, John) |
| Filing 3 LETTER ORDER granting extension of time to respond to the Complaint. Attorney John M. Campolieto for Charles LoTempio,John M. Campolieto for The City Of Rochester added., Answer due date updated as to Charles LoTempio answer due 5/11/2023; The City Of Rochester answer due 5/11/2023. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 4/17/23. (KAP) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Charles LoTempio, The City Of Rochester. (TMK) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. Charles J. Siragusa. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants $ 402 receipt number ANYWDC-4825124, filed by Lekia Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit summons req for City, #3 Exhibit Summons req for LoTempio)(Shields, Elliot) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
