Powers v. Allard et al
Eric Douglas Powers |
Sheriff James Allard, Major David Sutton, Lieutenant Wetherby, Sergeant Valentine, Officer Turner, Head of M.A.T. Scotland Reider, Director of NYDOC Daniel F. Martuscello, Mental Health Professional Bonnie and Detective Brook Payne |
6:2023cv06362 |
June 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Frank P Geraci |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief by Eric Douglas Powers.(LMD) |
Filing 8 DECLARATION signed by Eric Douglas Powers filed by Eric Douglas Powers. (LMD) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric Douglas Powers.(TF) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2023: #1 Authorization form) (TF). |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT in favor of Mental Health Professional Bonnie, Turner, Valentine, Wetherby, Brook Payne, Daniel F. Martuscello, David Sutton, James Allard, Scotland Reider against Eric Douglas Powers. Administratively terminating action. Case Closed. Signed by Mary C. Loewenguth, Clerk of Court on 7/6/2023. (LMD)This was mailed to: Eric Douglas Powers. |
Filing 5 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall administratively terminate this action without filing the Complaint or assessing a filing fee, and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to send to Plaintiff a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting affirmation and it is further ORDERED if plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall notify this Court, in writing, no later than 30 days from the date of this ORDER. This writing must include either (1) the required certification of plaintiff's inmate trust fund account (or the institutional equivalent) and authorization form or (2) the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee ($402.00 total) and it is further ORDERED #3 Motion for TRO is denied without prejudice to renew upon case reopening, and it is further ORDERED that upon Plaintiff's submission of either (1) the required certification and authorization form or (2) the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee ($402.00 total) the Clerk of Court shall reopen this case without further order. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 7/5/2023. (LMD)This was mailed to: Eric Douglas Powers with Motion to proceed IFP an authorization. Modified on 7/6/2023 (LMD). |
Filing 4 Letter from Plaintiff, dated 6/25/23, to Clerk of Court. (TF) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Eric Douglas Powers.(TF) |
Filing 2 MOTION/DECLARATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric Douglas Powers.(TF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Eric Douglas Powers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed summons, #3 Envelope)(TF) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Prisoner Pro Se packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, and Civil Case Timeline mailed to plaintiff. (TF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.