Walker v. New York State et al
Kimberly Yvonne Walker |
New York State and H&R Block |
6:2023cv06703 |
December 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Frank P Geraci |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RESPONSE in Support re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kimberly Yvonne Walker. (TF) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation: the ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TF) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Pro Se packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, Civil Case Timeline, ADR Notification and pro se assistance program info given to plaintiff at the counter. (TF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kimberly Yvonne Walker.(TF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against H&R Block, New York State, filed by Kimberly Yvonne Walker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 summons and civil cover sheet, #3 envelope)(TF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.