Rodriguez v. Chex Systems, Inc.
| Elizabeth A. Rodriguez |
| Chex Systems, Inc. |
| 6:2024cv06086 |
| February 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Elizabeth A Wolford |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
REPLY/RESPONSE to re #3 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Chex Systems, Inc. (Steinlight, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER re #5 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses are due on or before April 24, 2024. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 03/27/2024. (CAL)
|
|
Remark : Clerk Mailed Copy of Text Order to Elizabeth Rodriguez. (DAF)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Summary Judgment by Elizabeth A. Rodriguez.(RE)
|
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER re #3 Motion for More Definite Statement. Responses are due on or before March 25, 2024. The Court will not hold oral argument on the motion, but will decide the motion based on the papers submitted. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 02/26/2024. (CAL)
|
|
Remark : Clerk Mailed Copy of Text Order to Elizabeth A. Rodriguez. (DAF)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for More Definite Statement by Chex Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support) (Steinlight, Stephen)
|
|
Case Assigned to Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK)
|
|
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation: the ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK)
|
|
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Chex Systems, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent eFunds Corporation, Corporate Parent Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. for Chex Systems, Inc. (Steinlight, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Chex Systems, Inc. from Rochester City Court, Monroe County, case number CV008648-23/RO. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYWDC-5103365), filed by Chex Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Summons, #4 Exhibit C - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Steinlight, Stephen)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Chex Systems, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elizabeth A. Rodriguez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chex Systems, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Stephen J. Steinlight |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
