KeyBank, N.A. v. Calhoun et al
| KeyBank, N.A. |
| Jeffrey Calhoun, Tinya A. Calhoun, People of the State of New York and John Doe |
| 6:2024cv06088 |
| February 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Charles J Siragusa |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Tracy M. Fourtner on behalf of KeyBank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Fourtner, Tracy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Tinya A. Calhoun, Jeffrey Calhoun from Monroe County Supreme Court, case number E2024001736. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service)(RE) |
| Filing fee received in the amount $405.00, receipt number 600000697. (RE) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Pro Se packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, Civil Case Timeline, ADR Notification and pro se assistance program info given to plaintiff at the counter. (RE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
