WCMGC LLC et al v. County of Seneca et al
WCMGC LLC and MAXIM DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC |
COUNTY OF SENECA and LES MARQUART |
6:2024cv06142 |
March 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Frank P Geraci |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by H. Todd Bullard on behalf of County of Seneca, Les Marquart (Bullard, H. Todd) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Letter Request for Extension of Time. The Seneca County defendants have until June 1, 2024 to respond to the complaint. To the extent Plaintiffs wish to withdraw Maxim Development Group Inc. as a plaintiff, they should file a formal notice or stipulation to that effect. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 4/12/2024. (MFM) |
Filing 6 Letter filed by Maxim Development Group LLC, WCMGC LLC extend time to answer and file amended complaint. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Giglio, David) |
ATTENTION ALL PLAINTIFFS OR INTERVENORS: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.7.1 and/or General Order No. 157. In the Matter of Disclosure of Members, Shareholders, Partners, and Leaders of Business Organization Parties, all Disclosure Statements are to be filed within seven (7) days of this notice. (KM) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WCMGC LLC, Maxim Development Group LLC. Les Marquart served on 3/12/2024, answer due 4/2/2024. (Giglio, David) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WCMGC LLC, Maxim Development Group LLC. County of Seneca served on 3/12/2024, answer due 4/2/2024. (Giglio, David) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to County of Seneca, Les Marquart. (TMK) |
Case Assigned to Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov.' Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan. (TMK) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MAXIM DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC, WCMGC LLC. (Giglio, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WCMGC LLC et al v COUNTY OF SENECA et al (Seneca) against COUNTY OF SENECA, LES MARQUART $ 405 receipt number ANYWDC-5121231, filed by WCMGC LLC, MAXIM DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Proposed Summons)(Giglio, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.