Gurrant et al v. Five Star Bank
| Wendy Gurrant and Tanya Hoover |
| Five Star Bank |
| 6:2024cv06155 |
| March 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Elizabeth A Wolford |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter filed by Five Star Bank Stipulated Request to extend Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint. (Smith, Lisa) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Five Star Bank identifying Corporate Parent Financial Institutions, Inc. for Five Star Bank. (Smith, Lisa) |
| ATTENTION ALL PARTIES OR INTERVENORS: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and/or General Order No. 157 In the Matter of Disclosure of Members, Shareholders, Partners, and Leaders of Business Organization Parties, all Disclosure Statements are to be filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. (KM) |
| Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #6 consent request for extension of time. Defendant shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before May 13, 2024. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 04/11/2024. (MGB) |
| Filing 6 Letter filed by Five Star Bank Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. (Smith, Lisa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sam Williams on behalf of Five Star Bank (Williams, Sam) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa L. Smith on behalf of Five Star Bank (Smith, Lisa) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Brittany Willey on 03/22/2024, filed by Wendy Gurrant, Tanya Hoover. (Bilsborrow, James) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Five Star Bank. (TMK) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov.' Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan. (TMK) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Five Star Bank $ 405 receipt number ANYWDC-5129304, filed by Wendy Gurrant, Tanya Hoover. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit Summons)(Bilsborrow, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
