Kuriatnyk v. Piper et al
Steven Kuriatnyk |
Christopher Piper, Samantha Simonetti, David Blaho, Todd Baxter, "Richard Roe" Sheriff's Deputies 1-10 and Richard Roe Sheriff's Deputies 1-10 |
6:2024cv06196 |
April 2, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York |
Frank P Geraci |
Marian W Payson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Hon. Marian W. Payson: Telephone Scheduling Conference held on 5/2/2024. Scheduling Order to issue. Appearances: Elliot D. Shields, Esq. for plaintiff; Miguel A. Munoz, Esq. for defendants. (KAH) |
Filing 5 DISCOVERY PLAN by Steven Kuriatnyk.(Shields, Elliot) |
![]() |
Filing 3 TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Hon. Marian W. Payson, United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial matters excluding dispositive motions. The parties are encouraged to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Consent forms are available from the chambers of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. The parties may give consent to a Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and enter a final order dispositive of each motion; or such consent may be given for a limited purpose such as the disposition of a particular motion that would otherwise be before the District Judge in the absence of such consent. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 4/10/2024. (RWW) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Todd Baxter, David Blaho, Christopher Piper, Samantha Simonetti.(Munoz, Miguel) |
Case Assigned to Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov.' Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan. (TMK) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Monroe County Supreme Court, case number E2024004349 (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANYWDC-5145256), filed by David Blaho, Samantha Simonetti, Christopher Piper, Todd Baxter. (Attachments: #1 Index and Exhibit, #2 Federal Jury Demand, #3 Declaration of Service) (Munoz, Miguel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.