State of New York et al v. A.O. Smith Corporation
| State of New York, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Sean Mahar |
| A.O. Smith Corporation |
| 6:2024cv06298 |
| May 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Elizabeth A Wolford |
| Environmental Matters |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to A.O. Smith Corporation. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A.O. Smith Corporation $ 405 receipt number ANYWDC-5179327, filed by State of New York et al. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Buttino, Nicholas) Modified on 5/13/2024 (TMK). |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| E-Filing Notification: re #1 COMPLAINT against A.O. Smith Corporation $ 405 receipt number ANYWDC-5179327, filed by State of New York et al. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons)(Buttino, Nicholas) Modified on 5/13/2024 to fix the text regarding who the complaint is against (TMK). |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov.' Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan. (TMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
