Noel et al v. Stedman et al
Paul Noel and Donna Jenkins |
Trooper P. D. Stedman and Superintendnet Steven G. James |
6:2024cv06623 |
October 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Charles J Siragusa |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul Noel. (JHF) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Donna Jenkins.(TF) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT administratively terminate this action. Signed by Clerk of Court on 11/18/2024. (TF)This was mailed to: Paul Noel and Donna Jenkins. |
Filing 3 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Docket Item 2, is DENIED and the Clerk of Court shall administratively terminate this action without filing the Complaint or assessing a filing fee; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to send to Plaintiff a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting affirmation; and it is further ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, Plaintiff shall so notify this Court, in writing, no later than 30 days from the date of this Order. This writing must include either (1) a properly supported motion to proceed in forma pauperis or (2) the $350.00 filing fee and the $55.00 administrative fee ($405.00 total); and it is furtherORDERED that upon Plaintiff's submission of either (1) a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or (2) the $350.00 filing fee and the $55.00 administrative fee ($405.00 total), the Clerk of Court shall reopen this case without further order. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 11/14/2024. (MJK)This was mailed to: Plaintiff.Clerk to Follow up |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul Noel.(TF) |
Remark: No IFP or payment was provided. (TF) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Pro Se packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, Civil Case Timeline, ADR Notification sent to plaintiffs. (TF) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov. Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan.(TF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Steven G. James, P. D. Stedman, filed by Paul Noel, Donna Jenkins.(TF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.