In Re: New York Skyline, Inc.
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 20, 2015
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, I accept the Bankruptcy Court's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to the Electricity Provision and reject the Bankruptcy Court's interpretation of "near the Buil ding" in the Protocol Provision. If it has not already done so, the Bankruptcy Court is directed to enter the proposed order and final judgment dismissing Skyline's Third Claim submitted by ESB on August 31, 2015; thereafter, the reference of this adversary proceeding shall be withdrawn from the Bankruptcy Court. The parties are directed to submit to this Court an agreed upon judgment addressing all claims in this adversary proceeding other than Skyline's Third Claim. SO ORDERED. (As further set forth within this Opinion.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 10/20/2015) (ajs)
|August 26, 2015
(OPINION FROM THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK re: 09-b-10181 (SMB) and Adv. P. No. 09-a-1145(SMB)) POST-REMAND OPINION REGARDING COURT'S AUTHORITY TO ISSUE PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: The Clerk of is directed to file a copy of this opinion with the District Court in case No. 13 Civ. 7686(SAS). (Signed by United States Bankruptcy Judge Stuart M. Bernstein on 8/26/2015) (tro)
|August 1, 2014
OPINION AND ORDER: On June 16, 2014, this Court issued an Opinion and Order which vacated an Order and Final Judgment issued by Judge Stuart Bernstein (the "Judgment") and remanded the case for further proceedings. ESB now moves pursuant to Rule 62(c) and (g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an injunction or stay of the vacatur of the Judgment, and restoration of the Injunctions, pending the appeal. Oral argument was held on the motion on July 24, 2014. For the reasons set forth herein, ESB's motion is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/31/2014) (kgo)
|June 16, 2014
OPINION AND ORDER. Accordingly, I hold that: (1) Skyline did not consent to the bankruptcy court's power to enter a final judgment over non-core matters; (2) Skyline's claims are not core; and (3) there is a need for a further explanation as to whether the bankruptcy court had the power to hear the Skyline claims and to issue proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to those claims. The Judgment is hereby vacated and this case is remanded to the bankruptcy court for the limited purposes just described. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 6/16/2014) (lmb) (Main Document 15 replaced on 6/16/2014) (lmb).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?