Price v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Eastern District Price v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Price v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Plaintiff:	Jeffrey A. Price
Defendant:	Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Case Number:	1:2007cv00276
Filed:	November 15, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Chattanooga Office
County:	Hamilton
Presiding Judge:	R Allan Edgar
Presiding Judge:	Susan K Lee
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 8, 2009	Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED; Defendant's 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; the Court ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS Magistrate Judge William B Carter's 22 Report and Recommenda tion. The administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. The plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each party to bear their own costs of this action. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter a final judgment in accordance with this memorandum and order. The Clerk of Court shall close the record in this case. Signed by District Judge R Allan Edgar on 1/8/2009. (BJL, )
December 5, 2008	Filing 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings be DENIED re 15 and that the defendant's motion for summary judgment be GRANTED 20 . Signed by Magistrate Judge William B Carter on 12/5/08. (AWH, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 8, 2009

Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED; Defendant's 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; the Court ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS Magistrate Judge William B Carter's 22 Report and Recommenda tion. The administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. The plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each party to bear their own costs of this action. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter a final judgment in accordance with this memorandum and order. The Clerk of Court shall close the record in this case. Signed by District Judge R Allan Edgar on 1/8/2009. (BJL, )

December 5, 2008

Filing 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings be DENIED re 15 and that the defendant's motion for summary judgment be GRANTED 20 . Signed by Magistrate Judge William B Carter on 12/5/08. (AWH, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Price v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey A. Price
Represented By:	D. Seth Holiday
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?