Lee v. Captran SC, LLC
Petitioner: Franklin D. Lee
Respondent: Captran SC, LLC
Case Number: 1:2010cv00293
Filed: October 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Chattanooga Office
County: Polk
Presiding Judge: William B Carter
Presiding Judge: Curtis L Collier
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM with order to follow.Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 6/20/2012. (AWH, )
March 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM. An Order shall enter Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 3/11/11. (JGK, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Captran SC, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Franklin D. Lee
Represented By: Andrew Lampros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Captran SC, LLC
Represented By: James H Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?