Nam et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: William Nam and Jin Nam
Defendant: U.S. Xpress, Inc., U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc, U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., Sandra Patterson and John Does 1-3
Case Number: 1:2011cv00116
Filed: May 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Chattanooga Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Susan K Lee
Presiding Judge: Harry S Mattice
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 mv
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 212 ORDER granting 174 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 4/3/12. (GRE, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nam et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Nam
Represented By: Claire Debra Lim
Represented By: Terry Dale Jackson
Represented By: Adam U Holland
Represented By: Phillip E Fleenor
Represented By: Gary M. Cooper
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Zdrilich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jin Nam
Represented By: Gary M. Cooper
Represented By: Phillip E Fleenor
Represented By: Adam U Holland
Represented By: Terry Dale Jackson
Represented By: Claire Debra Lim
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Zdrilich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Represented By: John M Phillips
Represented By: K Stephen Powers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc
Represented By: John M Phillips
Represented By: K Stephen Powers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: John M Phillips
Represented By: K Stephen Powers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sandra Patterson
Represented By: John M Phillips
Represented By: K Stephen Powers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-3
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?