Haley v. Kundu et al
| Rita C Haley |
| Sobroto Kundu and Roma Kundu |
| 1:2011cv00265 |
| September 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Chattanooga Office |
| Meigs |
| Curtis L Collier |
| Susan K Lee |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 135 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 135 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 8/6/13. (mailed to Roma Trakru) (GRE, )
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER granting Oral Motion for Directed Verdict by Plaintiff; denying Oral Motion for Directed Verdict by Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 5/13/13. (hand delivered and emailed to Roma Trakru) (GRE, )
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER denying 88 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 5/6/2013. (BJL, ) Modified on 5/6/2013 (BJL, ).***Mailed to Roma Thackru.
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER denying 85 Motion to Continue; denying 87 Motion to Continue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 4/30/13. (emailed to Roma Trakru) (GRE, )
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER denying 60 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 60 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; denying 60 Motion for Leave to File Document; granting 61 Motion for Extension of Time to File; denying 65 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 4/24/13. (mailed to Roma Thackru) (GRE, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
