Waller v. Schofield, et al
| Ronald Bradford Waller |
| Derrick Schofield, Catherine Posey, Debbie Inglis, Bryce Coatney, Brandon Moloney, Jim Brown, Jim Morrow, Donita Moore, David Davis, Dennis Slatton, Charles Brymer and Andrew Lewis |
| 1:2012cv00136 |
| April 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Chattanooga Office |
| Hamilton |
| William B Carter |
| Curtis L Collier |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Defendant Lewiss motion for summary judgment [Doc. 95]will be GRANTED and this action will be DISMISSED. The Court hereby CERTIFIES that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Thus, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, this Court will DENY Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 8/30/2017. (BDG, ) Mailed to Ronald.
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM: Therefore, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, suasponte, for failure to prosecute and to comply with the orders of this Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1991). The Court will CERTIFY that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. See Fed. R. App. P. 24. AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 9/29/2014. (DJH, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
