Satterwhite v. Jennings et al
George Satterwhite |
Michelle Tipton, Doctor Bushawn and Paul L Jennings |
1:2012cv00313 |
September 19, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Chattanooga Office |
Hamilton |
Curtis L Collier |
Susan K Lee |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART (Court File No. 3). Plaintiff is a prisoner in custody at CCA-Silverdale, so he is ASSESSED the full civil filing fee of $350 .00. Plaintiff SHALL label Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs failure to amend his complaint within twenty (20) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order will result in the complaint being dismissed for failure to state a claim and for failure to pr osecute and follow the orders of this Court. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 5/5/2014. (BJL, )Mailed to George Satterwhite, along with a copy of the original complaint and a blank 1983 Complaint. Memorandum and Order also mailed to the Warden and Custodian of Records at CCA-Silverdale, in Chattanooga, TN, the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Corrections, the State Attorney General, and emailed to the Court's Financial Deputy. Modified on 3/5/2014 (BJL, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.