Wills v. Cellular Sales of Tennessee, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Eastern District Wills v. Cellular Sales of Tennessee, LLC

Wills v. Cellular Sales of Tennessee, LLC

Plaintiff:	Rachel Wills
Defendant:	Cellular Sales of Tennessee, LLC
Case Number:	1:2012cv00391
Filed:	November 28, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Chattanooga Office
County:	Hamilton
Presiding Judge:	Curtis L Collier
Presiding Judge:	Susan K Lee
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 9, 2014	Filing 60 ORDER APPROVING FLSA SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion for Settlement and In Camera Review. The settlement of Plaintiffs FLSA claim, including the agreed upon at torney's fees for same, is APPROVED. Per the parties agreement, this case shall be DISMISSED with prejudice with each party bearing its own attorney fees and costs, except as otherwise provided in the settlement. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 9/9/2014. (BJL, )
August 18, 2014	Filing 51 ORDER re 49 Joint MOTION for Settlement and In Camera Review filed by Cellular Sales of Tennessee, LLC. The parties will be given an opportunity to further brief the issues presented herein by filing a brief (jointly or separately) in support of their motion no later than 14 days from the date this order is entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 8/18/2014. (BJL, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 9, 2014

Filing 60 ORDER APPROVING FLSA SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion for Settlement and In Camera Review. The settlement of Plaintiffs FLSA claim, including the agreed upon at torney's fees for same, is APPROVED. Per the parties agreement, this case shall be DISMISSED with prejudice with each party bearing its own attorney fees and costs, except as otherwise provided in the settlement. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 9/9/2014. (BJL, )

August 18, 2014

Filing 51 ORDER re 49 Joint MOTION for Settlement and In Camera Review filed by Cellular Sales of Tennessee, LLC. The parties will be given an opportunity to further brief the issues presented herein by filing a brief (jointly or separately) in support of their motion no later than 14 days from the date this order is entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 8/18/2014. (BJL, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wills v. Cellular Sales of Tennessee, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel Wills
Represented By:	Harry F Burnette
Represented By:	William H Payne, IV
Represented By:	Frank P Pinchak
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Cellular Sales of Tennessee, LLC
Represented By:	Robert L Bowman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?