Clark v. Watson
Plaintiff: Keith A Clark
Defendant: Eric Watson
Case Number: 1:2014cv00322
Filed: November 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Chattanooga Office
County: Bradley
Presiding Judge: William B Carter
Presiding Judge: Curtis L Collier
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION. This action will be DISMISSED sua sponte for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In light of this ruling, plaintiffs pending motions (Court File Nos. 6, 9, 12) will be DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 7/1/2015. (AML, ) Copy of M/O served to Keith Clark via US Mail.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith A Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?