Johnson v. Stokes
Plaintiff: Robert P Johnson
Defendant: Casey Stokes
Case Number: 1:2015cv00166
Filed: June 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Chattanooga Office
County: Rhea
Presiding Judge: Susan K Lee
Presiding Judge: Harry S Mattice
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER,ACCEPTS IN WHOLE 5 Report and Recommendations ; finding as moot 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff and CLOSE the case.Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 3/1/2016. (SAC, )Copy mailed to plaintiff Johnson.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert P Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Casey Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?